Friday, August 17, 2012

Smart Phone Owners Spend $38 Billion a year on International Calls?

Extraplating from the results of a survey conducted by Harris Interactive on its behalf, Rebtel estimates that U.S. mobile users could be spending $38 billion a year on international calls on their smart phones, annually.

Rebtel estimates that 21 percent of U.S. adult smart phone owners make international calls and spend an average of $156 every month doing so, Rebtel says.

If, according to the 2010 U.S. Census, there are 234.6 million adults age 18 or older in the United States, with 41 percent of the population owning a smart phone, and 21 percent of these people making international calls on their smartphones, then roughly 20 million Americans are spending nearly $38 billion a year on international calls on their smart phones annually.

Some might find that estimate fanciful. Visiongain calculates that in 2012 the global mobile VoIP market will see revenues of $2.5 billion.

Also, if U.S. mobile voice overall is about $120 billion, the Rebtel estimate would have international long distance comprising about 32 percent of all U.S. mobile voice revenues overall, a figure that seems unlikely.

According to the Federal Communications Commission, retained international revenues, revenues billed by U.S. carriers, less settlement amounts owed to foreign carriers for U.S.-billed traffic, plus settlement amounts due to U.S. carriers for foreign-billed traffic, amounted to $4 billion in 2009.

It is hard to reconcile total retained international calling revenues, on all networks, of $4 billiion, as reported by the FCC in 2011, with an estimate of U.S. smart phone calling of $38 billion.

Granted, it is harder these days to tally actual revenue, as more activity shifts to over the top IP mechanisms.

At some point, the estimates might be even harder to make, as mobile service providers switch from 3G networks for voice services, over to voice over LTE (voLTE), which will operate fundamentally in the same way as over the top mobile voice, the difference being the ownership of the services.

Still, the Rebtel estimate seems inflated. One has to assume that the sample was not representative of the typical base of smart phone users, or that respondents somehow misunderstood or inaccurately recalled their international long distance spending. 


Maybe I am misreading the FCC data. Or perhaps the FCC data isn't capturing mobile calling data. But the numbers do not add up.

No comments:

Many Winners and Losers from Generative AI

Perhaps there is no contradiction between low historical total factor annual productivity gains and high expected generative artificial inte...